Friday, July 6, 2012

Europe’s Missile Shield Conundrum Brings Together Russian and German Foreign Ministers

  RT, Russia Today reported German Foreign Minister, Guido Westerwelle, met Russia’s Foreign Minister, Sergey Lavrov, Thursday, in Moscow, to, as RT notes, discuss NATO and Russia’s role in Europe’s security that depends on every country’s cooperation for protection from weapons that were never very practical in such enormous quantities to begin with. Incredible diplomatic expense spent over a threat that has for all intents and purposes hung over our heads sixty-seven years. Doubling a theoretically less sophisticated era’s fantastically long Thirty Years War? While also fairly deniable, the world has never prospered financially more from war, though entirely debatable as societies have existed for no other reason than war before, while some still, after a fashion, continue now. For most of history territorial conflict was one of few opportunities that afforded a way for people to feed themselves through pillaging or providing monarchs backup stability. But as the world’s still overrun by conflict, our lack of modern progress is mystifying unless it’s realized how much we’ve depended on status quos. So however much negotiations are important, there’s still the earmarks of a complete boondoggle about this issue of nation-states protection from themselves. Fully defensively militarized Europe is too funny to not be extremely hilarious, while too tragic to not be ridiculous. No doubt a lot is at stake both nationally and internationally as RT reiterates the meeting’s necessity was many European officials are silent on US plans to construct a missile defense system in the heart of Eastern Europe.
  Germany’s Foreign Minister offered some candid remarks in an interview published in the Friday issue of Nezavisimaya Gazeta, saying, “I keep openly stressing time and again that security in Europe can be strengthened only through common efforts, and only together with Russia. I insist on continuing and, if possible, expanding cooperation between Russia and NATO. This concerns a common missile defense system as well.” Uh huh. Handouts wrapped with more ostentatious ribbon.
  The German Foreign Minister said Russia’s concern over being a future target is unwarranted, while pointing to areas of cooperation between Russia and NATO, like terrorism in Afghanistan. “Security of Russia, Europe and the U.S. can be ensured only by joint efforts rather than against each other.” Whether Germany brings Russia on board remains to be seen, but Westerwelle stressed Germany is actively involved in addressing issues of global and European security. While Russia has warned the US and NATO on numerous occasions that unless an agreement is reached on missile defense, the world faces another arms race. But unless fulfilling everything’s destruction, why would anyone want to do that if conscience is any guide? Though the commercialization of war unfortunately in our past has been enough of an incentive to ignore right and wrong.
7/6/2012
---------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
May 4 - 31, 2017
Europe's Missile Shield Conundrum Brings Together Russian and German Foreign Ministers
7/6/2012: The German Foreign Minister said Russia’s concern over being a future target is unwarranted, while pointing to areas of cooperation between Russia and NATO, like terrorism in Afghanistan. “Security of Russia, Europe and the U.S. can be ensured only by joint efforts rather than against each other.” Whether Germany brings Russia on board remains to be seen, but Westerwelle stressed Germany is actively involved in addressing issues of global and European security. While Russia has warned the US and NATO on numerous occasions that unless an agreement is reached on missile defense, the world faces another arms race. But unless fulfilling everything’s destruction, why would anyone want to do that if conscience is any guide? Though the commercialization of war unfortunately in our past has been enough of an incentive to ignore right and wrong.
_______________________________________________________
Unfortunately war's commercialization was, from the beginning, the incentive to ignore right and wrong.
This is Allah/God's life everyone should get less awkward

A Grand Parade of Pyrotechnics
  Universally used. Broad essays are a type of calisthenics. Not so craftily carved for broad release, that they specifically cater to various purchasers' griefs. But, while, recognizable, established, stature's how the world turns, an independent siren call is as intimidatingly challenging. As, apparently, once on, there's no taking myself off the soapbox.

ELECTIONS FOR EVERYONE?    
 Receiving THE WOLFIAN MAGAZINE 10
Special Edition: General Election 2017 Submission Request 
  Coinciding with the British General Election of June 8th 2017, I was delighted. Because being from across the, as it werepond. British politics are relatively none of my business, per se. However, I wrote a fairly coherent Cold War satire without ever visiting the Soviet Union or Russia. Just so my American credentials, regarding the blacklistings, etc., are unblemished, so to speak. Bill Clinton visited and became President. Times change. But the basics behind peoples' manipulation hasn't. Personally in Paris when the wall fell.
  Basically, from any view, we’re all victims of history's cobwebs. Just the ability to commercially manipulate the concept there's a left or right political outlook, confines the public to jargon fueled arenas. Participating in circles without escape? On the, NYC, radio I heard Marine Le Pen referred to as part of the new Populist movement. Deliberately robbing the emphasis on a nasty bigotry that's been nostalgically slipped back out from under humanity's repressive closet door full of ghosts that show up really spooky in the contrived light. 
  Is humility really gone for good? Because it is just political to, understand, develop, and exploit cultural nuances. But unethical to facilitate bigotry's remaining exploited and misunderstood. Commercial reality? Malarky, so-called Modern American Republican Party. Facing history is not shrugging it off. To borrow the phrase, proselytize brother. It's shame. Not arrogance. That's humility before the Lord. Conditioning the public to resent a loyal opposition is, yes, undemocratic. Not only that, the obsessions' benefits of the doubt reach only just so far ... boo. Considering everything's fake? I am, for the moment, the only Republican alive.
  So besides separate political environments being, relatively, the same difference, are manipulative American political perceptions directly applicable to British politics? Certainly the British Conservative train of thought derives from an ethical pursuit of individual independence. Not just the insurement of power's relegation of the individual to submission to the world's vast array of corporate states. and not just purely result from particular political advertising successes that framed the public consciousness to value certain harda__ expressions as more patriotic? Ha!  
  No political entities can really speak independently for any of us, is something to face. Don't Be Anyone's Sycophant isn't just advice. It's a dream. When what's really been understood as a public whole, has been the manipulated approaches to misunderstanding how everything actually is capitalism and how socialism works as well. While both political concepts, as currently pasted, are infamous for sticking it to the consumer where the opportunity's found. 
  There comes a time you hope people listen and at least give, the logic of independence, some skillful thought as to how all our lives actually evolved here from back there. It's not baffling how dogma's unstructured and twisted out of proportion. That slogans still replace the public sphere's coherence with ludicrousness that's preposterous when there's just, only one bottom line. Financial flow. Like Peace, Love and Understanding. What's so funny about vultures deciding who rules? Laying up wealth that has nothing better to do than lounge around with their own crowd, remaining, far and distantly, the crutch stifling "capitalism from the bottom up." 
  Political sophistication replacing dignity and honor through the skill to translate chanting crowds into popular culture has an extremely malignant history. Obviously I'd not brought that up if I thought it would help. But years pass, that become the next, again, hoping the public's too mature for sycophancy. But propaganda is doled out in measures, that rely on amplified awareness when jousting like a demon has the most allure. As these days, that the show's a show's extremely transparent. Such that it's probably impossible for politics to bring people to their senses? Why the cultural revolutions are contrived as threats, when custom's advancement is the real source of social advance. But within the, feeding on itself, big picture? Diplomacy's a retreatment behind power to strike without compromise. That there's ruthless rule, is why there are rules. Pro bono lawyers. Why there's so much smoke and so many mirrors, the public believes anything, as needs be. 
Life's such a grand adventure of discovery, the crying shame's individuals allowing their understanding to be framed.

Between The Lines: Power's nutshell. 

Long-time Iowa farm cartoonist fired after creating this cartoon.

     ... 
  Is a world where a sign of winning is the willingness to manipulate others, avoidable? As for instance, what Robert Ludlum fictionalized in The Chancellor Manuscript, describing a labyrinth-inal conspiracy of conspiracies of individuals. Bold schemes requiring bold victims never gets old and why Shakespeare doesn't die, they'd say.
  Well. Don't underestimate something Kim Jong-un and President Trump have in common. Preserving power while leaving out all the messy stuff involved in capitalism from the bottom up
Power's Before Honor and Ethics Always?
  See, what we're, as yet, really unable to get a handle on is, where does all this ceremonial meaning get us? The redundant pomp and circumstance. Superfluous to the emotionally shattered and shattering dilemmas, and coincidental consequences, that slip past our solving and elude rectification because power's really remote from the collateral damage caused. As a consequence, innocent victims and, where there's no shame, there's no honor. So, for the purpose of pacifying an alliance, once again, an American President put forward the ideal that one side's all the good guys whose obligation is to destroy the other ones. Everyone, apparently, expected to feel lost, and caught up, in this jihad nonsense that's scarred all our lives. Loosely derived from an obsession with enforcing morality every society has room for being far better at. Crime a state enterprise? Violence a religious act. What should end is our being made fools of. 
  Add to this whole load of crap, the literal preposterousness of a couple of American (high school) military school graduates emphasizing military might, when the really righteous goal is settling all this nonsense down. Not reinvigorating the delusion by encouraging jumping further in. It's okay because some have the best lifeboats money can buy and weaponry to protect them? When it's not about misconstruing equality, but a world that's better for everyone. Just what the damned feuds didn't need, was more fuel. 
Case in point, a president's claim God favored retaliation 
caused this appeal - 
  So the current president's arrogant inclusion of this statement, 
while speaking before a partisan Saudi crowd, again emphasizes the revengeful nature of the whole problem. Why the coincidences of humanity's losses aren't just risen from the dark by the alienated, dispirited minds of people used for impractical ends. Flags have been waved for cover many times before throughout history. Also declarations that God willed dominion over humanity by humanity. When we really crafted ourselves this way, and get nowhere free devising the myriad avoidances of direct blame. When each and every one of us not truly facing ourselves, results from others framing our brains to find comfort in the vicious cycle of hatred for others.
  Peace will guide the planets isn't just drivel, made up for a song. Or just another answer blown in the wind, my friend. ... .
  So actualities are on record. The president visited and touched cues while no one involved wants the hint revealed. That alienating and militaristic taunting is what involved all of us in this nonsense, in the first place, ... after all. And don't tell me I don't respect my friends in the military. Nonsense has gone on long enough. No?
  Avenging rivalries is how things are. So much of life consists of lying to each others' faces anyway. No matter how hard it's tried, Life's not a perfect trial in a perfect Court of Law. 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
People's ethical lapses are our faults for wanting a pedestal?    
*   Crime, Contagion and Commerce by JoAnne Brown
from Scientific Authority & Twentieth-century America
Soapbox View pursues the Twin Legacies 
Andy Rooney and I.F. Stone?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for your participation.